Tel:86-0750-6228802
Fax:86-0750-6228277
Mobile Phone:+8617718861990
Email:yingtong@yingtongpack.com
Address:Xinsha Industry, Muzhou Town, Xinhui District, Jiangmen, Guangdong Country Region China
WPP (Woven Polypropylene) valve bags are made by weaving polypropylene strips (tapes) into a fabric, then forming the bag (with a valve) from that woven material. Sometimes laminated or coated for extra protection.
Paper valve bags (multi-wall paper, kraft paper) are made by layering paper plies, often with glue or pasted/stitched bottoms, possibly with liners or coatings for moisture, etc. They are the traditional standard in many cement, food, feed, chemical industries.
Here are the key differences in strength, durability, and related performance:
Property | WPP Valve Bags | Paper Valve Bags |
---|---|---|
Tensile / Tear / Puncture Resistance | Much higher. WPP woven fabric resists tearing, puncturing, rough handling, sharp edges or abrasions better. | Lower. Strong paper can be used (multi-wall, high ply), but more prone to punctures / tears, especially under abrasion or when exposed to moisture. |
Durability in Rough Handling / Transport | Better. Less damage during transport, stacking, drop, etc., especially in humid or adverse conditions. | More vulnerable to damage: paper may crack, weaken, or tear when wet or under heavy load / impact. |
Moisture / Water Resistance | Better inherent resistance (especially if laminated or coated). WPP itself resists moisture uptake. | Poor in wet/humid conditions unless treated/coated or liner is used. Moisture can degrade paper strength significantly. |
Shape Retention / Load Bearing | WPP tends to retain shape when loaded; woven structure supports handling and stacking. | Paper bags may deform (bulge, sag) more under load or when partially filled, especially if not very stiff or multi-ply. |
Resistance to UV / Chemical / Corrosion / Abrasion | Generally better. PP is more resistant to chemicals, acids, alkalis, UV (if treated). Paper is weaker against those, especially long exposure. |
While WPP outperforms paper in many mechanical and environmental strength metrics, paper bags are not without advantages. Some contexts where paper may be preferred:
Speed of filling: Some studies (e.g. for cement) show paper sacks can be filled faster under certain conditions compared to WPP.
Dust emissions / product loss: Paper may produce less dust during filling, less leakage.
Environmental footprint / sustainability: Paper often has advantages in biodegradability, lower carbon footprint (depending on treatments and coatings).
Regulatory / market preferences: Some markets or products (food, feed) have strict rules about plastic contact / plastic content; paper (or paper with safe liner) may satisfy those better.
Some findings from recent tests / reports:
Paper sacks performed 21% faster filling than WPP sacks in certain cement tests.
In drop tests, WPP bags lost more material (cement) compared to paper — about 4× higher losses than with paper bags under certain multipoint test conditions.
WPP bags generally lower cost over time in high-wear environments because fewer replacements, less damage, less product loss.
The actual strength of either type (WPP or paper) depends heavily on:
Ply count (number of layers) for paper, thickness, and glue / stitching quality.
Whether paper bags have liners or coatings (e.g. PE liner, film, lamination) which can improve moisture resistance.
For WPP: whether laminated, UV treated, edge reinforced, type of weave, thickness of tapes.
Valve design and how well sealed; bottom sealing method; how seams are finished.
Handling, storage, environmental exposure (humidity, sunlight, chemicals).
Overall, WPP valve bags tend to be much stronger (tear, puncture, moisture, durability) in harsh conditions and for heavy or abrasive bulk materials. Paper bags still perform well in many standard conditions, especially when moisture can be controlled, and when production speed, environmental impact, or cost ‒ initially ‒ are more important.
If you’re choosing between them, the decision should factor in:
the environment in which bags will be stored, transported, used (wet/humid vs dry; rough vs gentle handling)
how sensitive the material is (dust, moisture, contamination)
desired lifespan / reuse potential
cost trade-offs: initial cost vs damage/product loss vs replacement cost